As of the November 1, 2026 check, Terrible Lizards has a PC Metascore of 78 from four critic reviews, labeled Generally Favorable. Its Metacritic user score is not yet available, with the page saying a user score becomes available after four ratings. That pending state is not a score of zero.
This is a launch snapshot. Review counts and scores can change as more reviews arrive. The PC platform matters: the displayed score should not be presented as a separately confirmed PS5 or Xbox Series X/S aggregate.
What the PC critic score includes
| Critic | Displayed score | Review date |
|---|---|---|
| CGMagazine | 80 | October 28, 2026 |
| Loot Level Chill | 80 | October 27, 2026 |
| Noisy Pixel | 80 | October 27, 2026 |
| The Wand Report | 70 | October 27, 2026 |
The page groups three reviews as positive and one as mixed. None of those four is classified as negative in this snapshot. Keep that distribution attached to the four-review sample; it is not a count of everyone who has played the game.
Do not recompute the visible scores and replace the published Metascore with your own result. The useful number for this query is the aggregate Metacritic displays, alongside its platform and review count.
The critic aggregate belongs to the PC entry; the user score is still pending.
A pending user score is not a zero
The user section shows no user reviews in the snapshot and labels the score not yet available. That is different from users assigning the game a very low score. A display of zero ratings counts submissions; it does not grade the game.
It is also different from the critic score. The 78 belongs to the critic aggregate. A person looking for audience reception should not read that number as though it were a combined critic-and-player rating.
When you revisit the page, check both the user score and the number of ratings next to it. An early handful of submissions has a different context from a much larger group, even if the headline score looks precise.
Steam and PlayStation ratings are different measurements
Steam's positive-review percentage and PlayStation's star ratings are separate systems. They come from different audiences and use different rating formats. Neither is the Metascore, and neither can simply be relabeled as a Metacritic user score.
For the same reason, a rating displayed by another game-tracking app should not be substituted when Metacritic has no user score. Confirm which service produced a number before deciding what it means.
The most useful comparison keeps the labels visible: PC critic aggregate, Metacritic user score, Steam user-review sentiment, and PlayStation player stars. They can contribute to a broader picture, but they do not become one interchangeable score.
Read the review themes before choosing a platform
The four critic summaries lean toward the parkour and creature-feature appeal. They highlight movement, tense chases, atmosphere and the deliberately cheesy tone. Noisy Pixel also flags weaker story and character development, while The Wand Report describes movement that falls short of complete frictionlessness.
A favorable aggregate therefore does not promise that every part of the game is equally strong. It also does not establish technical stability for your particular platform. Reviews around launch can precede patches, and a PC aggregate cannot settle the behavior of an individual PS5 encounter.
Check the correct game and platform entry
The entry you want is the WDR Studios game released on October 29, 2026. Use its developer, release date and game platform to distinguish it from similarly named film or animation results.
Then inspect the selected platform before reading the aggregate. Listing PC, Xbox and PlayStation among a game's available platforms does not mean that all three have the same published critic sample. For this launch snapshot, the supported score is specifically 78 on PC, based on four reviews.